Search Site
Menu
The Jurisdiction of a Federal Court

The Jurisdiction of a Federal Court

Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. A federal court’s authority to hear a specific case comes from the United States Constitution and federal laws. It is necessary for a federal court to have both subject matter jurisdiction (power over the legal matter involved in the case) and personal jurisdiction (power over the parties to the lawsuit) for the court to make a legally binding decision in a case.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

 

A federal court can hear legal disputes involving the United States Constitution, federal laws, and treaties (federal question jurisdiction). A federal court can also hear disputes between two states or cases involving citizens of two different states (diversity jurisdiction). The amount in controversy or amount of damages sought in a diversity suit has to exceed $ 75,000 for a federal court to be able to hear the case. Certain types of cases, such as bankruptcy and admiralty, may be heard only by federal courts.

Personal Jurisdiction

 

In addition to subject matter jurisdiction, a federal court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to a lawsuit for the court’s decision to bind the parties. The personal jurisdiction of a federal court is usually parallel with the personal jurisdiction of the state courts where the federal court is located. Laws and court rules also allow a federal court to have personal jurisdiction nationwide in certain situations.

Service of Process

 

Personal jurisdiction over a defendant (a person or a company defending a lawsuit) is obtained by service of process. The person or company is given notice that a lawsuit has been filed. Notice can be given in several ways. Notice of the lawsuit can be personally served on the defendant. In some situations, the notice can be mailed to the defendant or published in the newspaper.

Copyright 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

What others are saying about us
  • ""I would recommend Mr. Hudspeth unequivocally. Not only is he an outstanding business attorney, he also provided me with access to a divorce attorney. Thanks to his skill, and resources available outside the Phoenix law family, I was successful in challenging a “family law” mediation that was particularly and grossly unfair."" - Chandler, Arizona Private Individual

  • ""Thank you for the work you have done in creating these documents. It is always a pleasure dealing with this firm!"" - J. P.

  • "“An excellent response. Masterfully prepared. Thank you.”" - El Paso, Texas Real Estate Investor

Donald W. Hudspeth Attorney Photo
Donald W. Hudspeth
Principal Attorney

Attorney Donald W. Hudspeth has more than twenty years’ experience practicing corporate and business law. Before attending law school, Mr. Hudspeth held a stock brokers license at the age of 21 and owned his own business at the age of 23. He was a business law professor at Arizona State University, West Campus, and has conducted classes and seminars for a number of higher institutions and organizations. Mr. Hudspeth has published two books on law and is the founder of the radio programs Law on the Edge and Law Talk.

Brian K. Stanley Attorney Photo
Brian K. Stanley
Of Counsel

Attorney Brian K. Stanley has more than thirty years' experience practicing corporate and business law. Brian also worked for Sandra Day O'Connor in 1976-1977; Formerly with the Phoenix firm of Jones, Hunter & Lerch as of the dissolution of that firm in 1979. (Also Member, Law Office of Brian K. Stanley, PLLC).

Janae Ashley Perry-Meier Attorney Photo
Janae Ashley Perry-Meier
Associate

Janae Perry-Meier is a business and commercial law attorney focusing on international business. Janae handles both transactional and litigation matters, including: forming your business, drafting your contracts, franchising, business disputes, business divorce, mergers and acquisitions, private placements, securities compliance, and corporate governance. Janae also handles trademark registration, office action responses, and infringement cases.

Michael David Malin Attorney Photo
Michael David Malin
Associate

Michael Malin has been a practicing attorney in Arizona since 2013. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation. Prior to joining the firm, Michael litigated cases involving professional negligence, insurance bad faith, dram shop liability, personal injury and wrongful death, Indian law, probate, and criminal matters. Before attending law school, he worked for several startup companies in the then-nascent field of smartphone and tablet application development.

Natalia Beard-Artemieva  Attorney Photo
Natalia Beard-Artemieva
Attorney

Natalia (Natasha) Beard-Artemieva has been a practicing attorney in Arizona since 2014.

  • Preeminent AV Rated
    Client Distinction Award
    Bar Register
    AV Rating

Pay Your Bill Online

Use our easy-to-use and secure online payment feature to pay your bill. We accept all major credit cards.

Pay Your Bill

Contact us

Quick Contact Form