Search Site
Office Location :  3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 2500, Phoenix, Arizona 85012
Free Case Intake and Evaluation 866-696-2033
Grounds for Sanctioning State Judges

Grounds for Sanctioning State Judges

Judges are subject to standards of judicial conduct. Their actions are required to conform to certain norms and standards that relate to impartiality and ethical behavior. There are codes of judicial conduct for both state and federal judges. This article discusses cases in which state judges have been sanctioned or removed for ethical violations.

Legal Error


The New York Court of Appeals removed a judge from office because of his repeated failure to inform criminal defendants of their right to counsel under a state law. The court also found that the judge had imposed illegally excessive sentences and excessively high bail on defendants in disregard of the legal criteria for setting bail.

Administrative Failures


The Supreme Court of Indiana removed a judge for ongoing administrative failures. The court found that the judge had failed to issue timely decisions over a significant period of time and had failed to resolve cases promptly. The judge had also failed to comply with a directive to follow certain procedures relating to court records and files.

Instructing Potential Jurors to Lie


A California judge was publicly admonished for directing potential jurors to lie during criminal voir dire. The jury panel was overwhelmingly Caucasian, and the defendant was the African-American. The judge was concerned about the possibility of racial prejudice. He instructed the potential jurors to lie if, because of racial reasons, they doubted whether they would be able to give the defendant a fair trial.

Pattern of Misconduct


The Ohio Supreme Court suspended a judge from practicing law for two years after finding the judge had improper ex parte conversations (contact with only one side of the case). The judge had also improperly used county resources and employees in an unsuccessful political campaign.

Inappropriate Conduct toward Female Court Employees


The North Dakota Supreme Court suspended a judge for 60 days. The court found the judge had engaged in a series of inappropriate interactions with a female court employee. The judge had repeatedly made suggestive and crude comments.

Political Activity


A New York judge was admonished for political activity. The judge had made calls to party officials in support of a county party chairman’s re-election. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct found that the judge’s partisan political activity created an impression of loyalty to the party chair and was a violation of the ethical rules.

Handling Traffic Tickets


The Mississippi Supreme Court publicly reprimanded a judge after he aided several criminal defendants by dismissing their speeding tickets even though the defendants had not appeared in court. The judge was also fined for his actions.

Failure to Disqualify


The North Carolina Supreme Court censured a judge for his failure to disqualify himself in a pending case. The plaintiff (the party suing in the case) had a separate lawsuit pending against the judge. The judge had refused the plaintiff’s request to remove himself. The court held that the judge should have disqualified himself because of a perceived lack of impartiality.

Copyright 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

What others are saying about us
  • "I would recommend Mr. Hudspeth unequivocally. Not only is he an outstanding business attorney, he also provided me with access to a divorce attorney. Thanks to his skill, and resources available outside the Phoenix law family, I was successful in challenging a “family law” mediation that was particularly and grossly unfair." - Chandler, Arizona Private Individual

  • "Thank you for the work you have done in creating these documents. It is always a pleasure dealing with this firm!" - J. P.

  • "An excellent response. Masterfully prepared. Thank you." - El Paso, Texas Real Estate Investor

  • "Glad about meeting with Don. Felt so much better, better than in 15 years. Really appreciated the conversation." - RH, Phoenix Manufacturing Company

Donald W. Hudspeth Attorney Photo
Donald W. Hudspeth
Principal Attorney

Attorney Donald W. Hudspeth has more than twenty years’ experience practicing corporate and business law. Before attending law school, Mr. Hudspeth held a stock brokers license at the age of 21 and owned his own business at the age of 23. He was a business law professor at Arizona State University, West Campus, and has conducted classes and seminars for a number of higher institutions and organizations. Mr. Hudspeth has published two books on law and is the founder of the radio programs Law on the Edge and Law Talk.

Brian K. Stanley Attorney Photo
Brian K. Stanley
Of Counsel

Attorney Brian K. Stanley has more than thirty years' experience practicing corporate and business law. Brian also worked for Sandra Day O'Connor in 1976-1977; Formerly with the Phoenix firm of Jones, Hunter & Lerch as of the dissolution of that firm in 1979. (Also Member, Law Office of Brian K. Stanley, PLLC).

Janae A. Perry-Meier Attorney Photo
Janae A. Perry-Meier

Janae Perry-Meier is a business and commercial law attorney focusing on international business. Janae handles both transactional and litigation matters, including: forming your business, drafting your contracts, franchising, business disputes, business divorce, mergers and acquisitions, private placements, securities compliance, and corporate governance. Janae also handles trademark registration, office action responses, and infringement cases.

Michael David Malin Attorney Photo
Michael David Malin

Michael Malin has been a practicing attorney in Arizona since 2013. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation. Prior to joining the firm, Michael litigated cases involving professional negligence, insurance bad faith, dram shop liability, personal injury and wrongful death, Indian law, probate, and criminal matters. Before attending law school, he worked for several startup companies in the then-nascent field of smartphone and tablet application development. test

Laura Underwood Attorney Photo
Laura Underwood
Litigation Paralegal

About Laura Underwood is a Litigation Paralegal whose background includes specialized family law with the Attorney General’s Office as well as some personal injury and trademark law.

  • Preeminent AV Rated
    Client Distinction Award
    Bar Register
    AV Rating
    The Arizona Republic
  • Newsweek
    Arizona Sate University
    Top Rated Lawyers
    Client Champion
    McAfee Secure
  • Lawyers Of Distinction
    2020 issue of AZ Business Leaders

Our firm now offers a scholarship program for ASU first and second year law students.

The scholarship is awarded to students for academic merit with an interest in business and business law. Candidates may have majored in fields other than business, have taken a break between college and law school, or have had exceptional life experiences.

Pay Your Bill Online

Use our easy-to-use and secure online payment feature to pay your bill. We accept all major credit cards.

Pay Your Bill

Contact us

Quick Contact Form